In the realm of professional management , there are instances of misconduct that slip through the cracks , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, falls squarely in the latter category — a story of suspected unethical behavior that significantly damages the reputation of a solitary executive but throws doubt over the company’s principles .

Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has held onto his title , seemingly unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of improper behavior started with violations of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t end there . Instead, it transformed into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left fellow employees demoralized and stakeholders confused .

Throughout a leadership improvement workshop—ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a serious training session into a spree of inappropriate episodes . Insiders suggest he spent organization-paid excursions seeking inappropriate relations, a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s business principles , all while his household stayed oblivious .

But the impropriety didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including symbols celebrating indiscretions—paints a picture of a man heedless of the repercussions . Following these digital advances , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on several Ventia New Zealand instances during work time , despite his own marital status and her having a significant other. This blatant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but destroyed families —creating a trail of betrayal that extended outside of the workplace .

In what way can this behavior be enabled to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, stems from a worrisome failure of governance within the firm . Grievances have been filed , yet Collins continues unchecked .

This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that status and power within the company can protect individuals from consequences . It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , disheartens staff , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .